upgrade llvm@22
This commit is contained in:
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
| Alternative | Why not (now) |
|
||||
|-------------|---------------|
|
||||
| **In-process lld + bundled musl sysroot** (sx owns the pipeline; no zig) | Requires a custom LLVM build *with* lld — the Homebrew `llvm@19` here ships none (`liblld*.a`, headers, `ld.lld` all absent) — plus a C++ lld shim and per-arch prebuilt musl. Strictly more work for the same user-visible result. The right *eventual* target if we want zero foreign binaries; tracked as a follow-up. |
|
||||
| **In-process lld + bundled musl sysroot** (sx owns the pipeline; no zig) | Requires a custom LLVM build *with* lld — the Homebrew `llvm@22` here ships none (`liblld*.a`, headers, `ld.lld` all absent) — plus a C++ lld shim and per-arch prebuilt musl. Strictly more work for the same user-visible result. The right *eventual* target if we want zero foreign binaries; tracked as a follow-up. |
|
||||
| **Full Zig-style: build libc from source on demand** | Most flexible (any arch/libc version, no prebuilt blobs) but the most work; only worth it after the in-process-lld path exists. |
|
||||
| **Document a hard dependency on system `cc`** | Zero engineering, but defeats the goal — the box still needs `build-essential`. Acceptable only as the current fallback, not the distribution story. |
|
||||
| **Bundle just `ld.lld` + a musl sysroot (no full zig)** | Smaller than a whole zig, but we'd hand-manage crt object selection, dynamic-linker paths, and import libs — i.e. re-derive what `zig cc` already encapsulates. Bundle-size saving doesn't justify the fragility. |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user