fix: reject non-type expression in type position instead of fabricating {} (issue 0189)

Two type-resolution paths silently resolved a non-type AST node in type
position to a zero-field `{}` struct that reached codegen with no
diagnostic:
  - a dotted `type_expr` / field-access (`g.a`, `g` a runtime value) whose
    prefix is not a namespace alias
  - an `error_type_expr` (`!Name`) whose `Name` is not a declared error set

Now both reject loudly:
  - `resolveTypeWithBindings` (lower.zig): "expected a type, found a value
    '<name>' in type position" + `.unresolved`
  - `checkTypeNodeForUnknown` (semantic_diagnostics.zig): validates a named
    `!E` against the declared error-set names — "unknown error set
    '<name>'" / "expected an error set after '!', found type '<name>'".

A bare `!` (void channel) and a declared `!E` in return position stay
valid; namespace-qualified types (`pkg.Type`) are unaffected.

Regression: examples/diagnostics/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.

examples/diagnostics/expected/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.exit

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1

examples/diagnostics/expected/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+error: unknown error set 'Nonexistent'
+  --> examples/diagnostics/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.sx:31:9
+   |
+31 |     z : !Nonexistent = ---;        // `!` of an undeclared name
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: unknown error set 'Nonexistent'
+  --> examples/diagnostics/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.sx:32:20
+   |
+32 |     w : Tuple(i32, !Nonexistent) = ---;       // nested in a tuple
+   |                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: unknown error set 'Nonexistent'
+  --> examples/diagnostics/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.sx:33:17
+   |
+33 |     v : Closure(!Nonexistent) -> i32 = ---;   // nested in a closure param
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: expected a type, found a value 'g.a' in type position
+  --> examples/diagnostics/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.sx:29:9
+   |
+29 |     x : g.a = ---;                 // field-access value in type position
+   |         ^^^
+
+error: expected a type, found a value 'g.a' in type position
+  --> examples/diagnostics/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.sx:30:20
+   |
+30 |     y : Tuple(i32, g.a) = ---;     // same, as a tuple element
+   |                    ^^^

examples/diagnostics/expected/1195-diagnostics-non-type-in-type-position.stdout

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+