fix: diagnose ?? with a non-optional lhs instead of codegen panic (issue 0172)

lowerNullCoalesce fed resolveOptionalInner's .unresolved (returned for a
non-optional lhs) into the merge-block params / optionalUnwrap / RHS
target type, reaching codegen and panicking 'unresolved type reached
LLVM emission'. Guard: when inferExprType(nc.lhs) is a resolved
non-optional type, emit a located diagnostic and bail; an .unresolved
lhs (prior error) is excluded to avoid double-report. ?? is optional-only
per specs.md (error unions use or/catch), so rejecting a failable lhs is
correct; comptime panic closed too.

Regression: examples/diagnostics/1200-diagnostics-null-coalesce-non-optional.sx.
Verified by 3 adversarial reviews, suite 790/0. Filed adjacent bug 0180
(?? lowering defects for generic/alias/tuple optional lhs).
This commit is contained in:
agra
2026-06-23 03:31:58 +03:00
parent e5b682e622
commit 58f97fff10
7 changed files with 113 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,18 @@
# 0172 — `??` with a non-optional left-hand side panics instead of diagnosing
> **RESOLVED.** `lowerNullCoalesce` fed `resolveOptionalInner`'s `.unresolved`
> (returned for a non-optional lhs) into the merge-block / `optionalUnwrap` / RHS
> target type → codegen panic. Fix (`src/ir/lower/expr.zig`): before computing
> `inner_ty`, if `inferExprType(nc.lhs)` is a RESOLVED non-optional type, emit a
> located diagnostic ("left operand of '??' must be an optional, but has type
> '<T>'") and bail; an `.unresolved` lhs (prior error) is excluded to avoid
> double-report. `??` is optional-only per specs.md (error unions use
> `or`/`catch`), so rejecting a failable lhs is correct. Comptime panic closed
> too. Verified by 3 adversarial reviews; suite 790/0. Regression:
> `examples/diagnostics/1200-diagnostics-null-coalesce-non-optional.sx`. (Adjacent
> pre-existing `??`-lowering defects found + filed: 0180 — generic / alias /
> tuple optional lhs.)
## Symptom
Using `??` where the left operand is NOT an optional panics the compiler:

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
# 0180 — `??` lowering defects for generic / alias / tuple optional lhs (wrong fallback, segfault, PHI mismatch)
## Symptom
`lowerNullCoalesce` mishandles several non-trivial optional lhs shapes (all with a
genuinely-optional lhs, so the issue-0172 non-optional guard correctly does not
fire). Found during adversarial review of issue 0172.
1. **Generic `??` returns the WRONG fallback** (VERIFIED — silent miscompile):
a `??` inside a generic function where the lhs is a type-param-typed optional
`?T` drops the RHS default and returns the zero payload instead.
2. **Alias-optional with a struct-literal default segfaults** (reported by review):
`?Opt ?? Opt.{}` where `Opt :: ?Struct` crashes in type interning
(`hashString`/wyhash).
3. **`?(i32) ?? i32` LLVM PHI-type mismatch** (reported by review): an
optional-of-1-tuple coalesced with a scalar default emits `phi { i32 }` vs
`i32`.
(Scalar-default alias-optional `Opt :: ?i64; o ?? 7` works correctly — the
defects are specific to the shapes above.)
## Reproduction
(1) Generic `??` wrong fallback — VERIFIED, prints `0`, expected `99`:
```sx
#import "modules/std.sx";
unwrap_or :: (d: $T, x: ?T) -> T { return x ?? d; }
main :: () { b : ?i32 = null; print("{}\n", unwrap_or(99, b)); } // prints 0 — WRONG
```
(2) Alias-optional + struct-literal default (reported segfault):
```sx
#import "modules/std.sx";
S :: struct { a: i64 = 0; }
Opt :: ?S;
main :: () { o : Opt = null; x := o ?? S.{ a = 7 }; print("{}\n", x.a); }
```
(3) Optional-of-tuple + scalar default (reported PHI mismatch):
```sx
#import "modules/std.sx";
main :: () { o : ?(i32) = null; x := o ?? 5; }
```
## Investigation prompt
`src/ir/lower/expr.zig` `lowerNullCoalesce`. For (1), when the lhs optional's
child is a TYPE PARAMETER (`?T`, resolved per monomorphization), the present/
absent merge appears to drop the RHS default and yield the zero payload — check
that `inner_ty` and the merge-block param resolve to the monomorphized child and
that the RHS (`d`) is correctly selected on the null path. For (2)/(3), the merge
of present-payload vs default has a type mismatch when the child is an
alias/struct (interning crash) or a 1-tuple (PHI `{i32}` vs `i32`) — the default
and the unwrapped payload must share the exact merge TypeId. Verify each repro
produces the expected value (`99`, `7`, and a clean `?(i32)` coalesce); confirm
the generic case across multiple instantiations. Add regressions under
`examples/optionals/09xx-...`. (These reproduce on master, independent of the
issue-0172 guard.)