lab/sx
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs(lang): fix invalid protocol method-signature snippets — (self) -> () -> s64 [F0.6]

Browse Source 
A protocol method signature omits the receiver; a bare `self` has no type, so
`protocol { … :: (self) … }` fails at parse with 'expected :'. Correct the three
member-exemption doc snippets (readme.md, specs.md, issues/0089) to the valid
signature form, matching examples/0158's `Speaker :: protocol { s2 :: () -> s64; }`.
This commit is contained in:
agra
2026-06-04 23:02:09 +03:00
parent 166b42c308
commit b9a29c39c5
3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
issues/0089-backtick-raw-identifier.md
View File

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
> ([src/parser.zig]); a bare `f32` / `f64` is therefore rejected at parse > ([src/parser.zig]); a bare `f32` / `f64` is therefore rejected at parse
> (`expected field name in struct`) even in a member position, and still needs > (`expected field name in struct`) even in a member position, and still needs
> the backtick there too — `` struct { `f32: s64; } `` / `` union { `f64: … } `` > the backtick there too — `` struct { `f32: s64; } `` / `` union { `f64: … } ``
> / `` protocol { `f32 :: (self); } `` work as field / tag / method names. > / `` protocol { `f32 :: () -> s64; } `` work as field / tag / method names.
> The exemption stops at member *definitions*: an `impl` method is a real > The exemption stops at member *definitions*: an `impl` method is a real
> function reached through the `impl_block` → `fn_decl` arm, so a > function reached through the `impl_block` → `fn_decl` arm, so a
> reserved-spelled impl method needs the backtick (`` `s2 :: (self) ``), no > reserved-spelled impl method needs the backtick (`` `s2 :: (self) ``), no

2
readme.md
View File

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ function declaration, an `impl` method definition, or a `::` type declaration
(`s2 :: 5` and `s2 :: (n) { … }` are rejected just like `s2 := 5`). **Member-name (`s2 :: 5` and `s2 :: (n) { … }` are rejected just like `s2 := 5`). **Member-name
positions are exempt**: a struct *field*, a union *tag*, and a protocol positions are exempt**: a struct *field*, a union *tag*, and a protocol
*method-signature* may be a bare reserved spelling (`struct { s2: s64 }`, *method-signature* may be a bare reserved spelling (`struct { s2: s64 }`,
`union { u8: … }`, `protocol { s2 :: (self) }`) — they are reached via `obj.name`, `union { u8: … }`, `protocol { s2 :: () -> s64 }`) — they are reached via `obj.name`,
so they never mis-lower. The bare exemption covers only the identifier-classified so they never mis-lower. The bare exemption covers only the identifier-classified
reserved names (`s1`..`s64`, `u1`..`u64`, `bool`, `string`, `void`, `usize`, reserved names (`s1`..`s64`, `u1`..`u64`, `bool`, `string`, `void`, `usize`,
`isize`, `Any`); `f32` and `f64` are lexer keywords, so even in a member slot they `isize`, `Any`); `f32` and `f64` are lexer keywords, so even in a member slot they

2
specs.md
View File

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ reserved spellings — `s1`..`s64`, `u1`..`u64`, `bool`, `string`, `void`, `usiz
member-name slots require an identifier token; a bare `f32` / `f64` is therefore member-name slots require an identifier token; a bare `f32` / `f64` is therefore
rejected at parse (`expected field name in struct`) even in a member position. Use rejected at parse (`expected field name in struct`) even in a member position. Use
the backtick there too — `` struct { `f32: s64; } `` / `` union { `f64: … } `` / the backtick there too — `` struct { `f32: s64; } `` / `` union { `f64: … } `` /
`` protocol { `f32 :: (self); } `` work as field / tag / method names. `` protocol { `f32 :: () -> s64; } `` work as field / tag / method names.
```sx ```sx
s2 := 2.5; // ERROR: 's2' is a reserved type name and cannot be used as an identifier s2 := 2.5; // ERROR: 's2' is a reserved type name and cannot be used as an identifier