lang: rename signed integer types sN -> iN
Surface rename of the signed integer family: s1..s64 become i1..i64
(u1..u64, usize, isize unchanged). 'string' keeps the s-prefix arm in
name classification; width parsing moves to the i-prefix arm next to
isize.
Internal TypeId tags follow the surface (.s8/.s16/.s32/.s64 ->
.i8/.i16/.i32/.i64), as do mono-key mangle fragments (ptr_i64,
tu_i64_bool) and all display/diagnostic formatting (i{d}).
Migrated in the same sweep: stdlib + examples + issue repros + FFI C
companions (shared symbol names like ffi_id_i64), expected
stdout/stderr/ir snapshots, specs.md, readme.md, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md,
implementation_plan.md, docs/, issue writeups. Vendored stb_image and
historical flow state left untouched.
zig build test: 426/426; examples suite: 595/595.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -21,14 +21,14 @@
|
||||
> - `src/ir/expr_typer.zig` — numeric-limit inference arm: the `shadowed`
|
||||
> check now calls the same helper.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> A bare `f64.epsilon` / `s32.max` (a `.type_expr` receiver, never an
|
||||
> A bare `f64.epsilon` / `i32.max` (a `.type_expr` receiver, never an
|
||||
> `.identifier`) still folds, even when a global or module-const raw value of
|
||||
> the same spelling exists — the bare receiver is never value-shadowed.
|
||||
> Float-only-on-int and non-numeric-receiver errors are unchanged.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Regression: `examples/0161-types-numeric-limit-value-shadow.sx` now exercises
|
||||
> all three binding kinds — a GLOBAL `` `f32 ``, a MODULE-CONST `` `s16 ``, and
|
||||
> LOCAL `` `f64 ``/`` `s32 ``/`` `u8 `` — each reading its field while the bare
|
||||
> all three binding kinds — a GLOBAL `` `f32 ``, a MODULE-CONST `` `i16 ``, and
|
||||
> LOCAL `` `f64 ``/`` `i32 ``/`` `u8 `` — each reading its field while the bare
|
||||
> spelling still folds. Unit test `src/ir/expr_typer.test.zig` pins the global
|
||||
> + module-const sources. NL.1 (`examples/0148`) / NL.2 (`examples/0159`,
|
||||
> `examples/0160`) unregressed.
|
||||
@@ -40,20 +40,20 @@
|
||||
Field access on a **global** raw reserved-spelled value binding is interpreted as
|
||||
a builtin type numeric-limit access instead of an ordinary value field access.
|
||||
Observed: the repro prints `0.000000 2147483647` (`f64.epsilon` /
|
||||
`s32.max`). Expected: it prints `12 78` from the `Box` fields.
|
||||
`i32.max`). Expected: it prints `12 78` from the `Box` fields.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reproduction
|
||||
|
||||
```sx
|
||||
#import "modules/std.sx";
|
||||
|
||||
Box :: struct { epsilon: s64; max: s64; }
|
||||
Box :: struct { epsilon: i64; max: i64; }
|
||||
|
||||
`f64 := Box.{ epsilon = 12, max = 34 };
|
||||
`s32 := Box.{ epsilon = 56, max = 78 };
|
||||
`i32 := Box.{ epsilon = 56, max = 78 };
|
||||
|
||||
main :: () -> s32 {
|
||||
print("{} {}\n", `f64.epsilon, `s32.max);
|
||||
main :: () -> i32 {
|
||||
print("{} {}\n", `f64.epsilon, `i32.max);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ at `Lowering.lowerNumericLimit` and the new issue-0092 guard around
|
||||
`Scope.lookup`. That guard returns `null` for a shadowing local, but global raw
|
||||
bindings are registered in `ProgramIndex.global_names` (and module constants in
|
||||
`ProgramIndex.module_const_map`), not in `Scope`, so an `.identifier` receiver
|
||||
whose text is `f64` / `s32` still folds to a numeric limit before ordinary
|
||||
whose text is `f64` / `i32` still folds to a numeric limit before ordinary
|
||||
global field lowering can read the value. Mirror the same rule in
|
||||
`src/ir/expr_typer.zig` so inferred types match lowering.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Likely fix: for `.identifier` numeric-limit receivers, prefer any in-scope value
|
||||
binding source over the builtin-type fold: lexical `Scope.lookup`, global values
|
||||
(`program_index.global_names`), and module value constants where applicable.
|
||||
Keep `.type_expr` receivers folding as type receivers, so bare `f64.epsilon` and
|
||||
`s32.max` still fold even when a raw global value of the same spelling exists.
|
||||
`i32.max` still fold even when a raw global value of the same spelling exists.
|
||||
|
||||
Verification: pin the repro above as a regression. It should print `12 78`.
|
||||
Also verify the existing numeric-limit examples still pass:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user