Uncomments the second passthrough case in `examples/issue-0038.sx`
that captures `recv` from the enclosing function into a closure body
that uses it inside `#objc_call(s64)(recv, "hash")`. Current behavior
is a hard error from the name-resolution pass:
examples/issue-0038.sx:28:48: error: unresolved: 'recv'
Snapshot locks the failure in (exit 1 + that error message) so the
next commit can flip it to passing without ambiguity. Per the FFI
cadence rule this is a test-add (xfail); the make-green follow-up
adds the missing recursion arm in `lower.zig`'s `collectCaptures` for
`.ffi_intrinsic_call` nodes.
Surfaced while writing the Phase 1.11 in-construct test. The
closure free-variable analyzer doesn't recursively visit the
`ffi_intrinsic_call` AST node introduced in Phase 1.1, so any
identifier used inside `#objc_call` / `#jni_call` /
`#jni_static_call` from a closure body trips:
error: unresolved: '<name>'
The same identifier captured from the same scope into a plain
expression resolves fine — so the bug is localized to whatever
recursive arm-walk powers the capture analysis.
Likely fix: add an `ffi_intrinsic_call => { ... }` arm wherever
the `.call =>` arm visits `callee` + `args`. Candidate files:
- src/sema.zig (capture / scope tracking)
- src/ir/lower.zig (closure body lowering / `lowerLambda`)
Both should be checked.
Workaround in the meantime: reach the captured value via a
module-level global from inside the closure body. See the
`g_hasher_recv` pattern in
examples/ffi-objc-call-09-in-construct.sx for an applied
instance.
