Surface rename of the signed integer family: s1..s64 become i1..i64
(u1..u64, usize, isize unchanged). 'string' keeps the s-prefix arm in
name classification; width parsing moves to the i-prefix arm next to
isize.
Internal TypeId tags follow the surface (.s8/.s16/.s32/.s64 ->
.i8/.i16/.i32/.i64), as do mono-key mangle fragments (ptr_i64,
tu_i64_bool) and all display/diagnostic formatting (i{d}).
Migrated in the same sweep: stdlib + examples + issue repros + FFI C
companions (shared symbol names like ffi_id_i64), expected
stdout/stderr/ir snapshots, specs.md, readme.md, CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md,
implementation_plan.md, docs/, issue writeups. Vendored stb_image and
historical flow state left untouched.
zig build test: 426/426; examples suite: 595/595.
`ExprTyper.inferType`'s binary-op arm inferred every non-comparison op
from the LHS alone, so `M + 0.5` (s64 + f64) statically typed as s64
while `0.5 + M` typed as f64 — operand-order-dependent. The value path
(`lowerBinaryOp`) already promoted int×float → float, so static
inference disagreed with the value: `M + 0.5` formatted as a truncated
int and a typed const `BAD : s64 : M + 0.5` was accepted+truncated
(issue 0088 mixed-numeric escape).
Extract the value path's inline promotion into a shared
`Lowering.arithResultType(lhs, rhs)` and reuse it at both sites, so
arithmetic / bitwise / shift inference reports exactly the type the
lowered value carries — int LHS × float RHS → the float, order-
independent. The value-path behavior is unchanged (the block is moved
verbatim into the helper), so no IR shifts; the suite stays green. The
typed-const validation reuses `inferExprType`, so this auto-closes the
escape with no change to the validation logic.
- examples/1143: BAD/BAD2 (`s64 : M + 0.5`, `s64 : 0.5 + M`) rejected
in both operand orders.
- examples/0162: MF/MFR (`f64 : M + 0.5`, `f64 : 0.5 + M`) fold to 2.5.
- examples/0163 (new): pins the inference fix in a value context
(`print("{}", n + 0.5)` formats the float, both orders, +-*/, f32).
- expr_typer.test.zig: arithResultType + mixed-arithmetic inference.
- specs.md / readme.md: document the numeric-promotion rule.
- issues/0088: RESOLVED banner notes the inferExprType root fix.
Attempt 1 rejected only LITERAL initializers that mismatch a typed module
const's annotation; a const-EXPRESSION initializer escaped, so the same
issue-0088 root remained for `M :: 2; N : string : M + 2` — accepted at exit 0,
folding `[N]s64` to 4 and printing N as an integer.
Root cause: `registerTypedModuleConst` validated only the enumerated literal
node kinds; any other kind fell through to `else => {}`, and pass 0
pre-registers binary_op/unary_op consts as a `.s64` placeholder that was never
reconciled with the annotation.
Fix — validate by TYPE, not by node kind:
- lower.zig: `registerTypedModuleConst` now covers literals AND const-expressions
(binary_op/unary_op) through one path. `typedConstInitFits` keeps the literal
arms and routes any non-literal through the new `constExprInitFits`, which
compares the initializer's INFERRED type (`inferExprType`, the existing
type-inference facility — no second const evaluator) to the annotation with the
same integer/float compatibility. A mismatch emits the `type mismatch` diagnostic
(a const-expression is described by its inferred type, e.g. "an integer
expression") and evicts the pass-0 placeholder; a match registers the const at
its resolved annotation type (the same `put` the literal path always did), so a
const-expression folds and emits at its declared type.
- `literalKindName` → `initializerDescription` (+ `constExprDescription`) so the
message is accurate for both a literal and a const-expression initializer.
Regression:
- examples/1143: extended with `E : string : M + 2` and `V : string : -M`
(const-expr mismatches → exit 1, pinned diagnostics).
- examples/0162: extended with `KE : s64 : M + 2` (used as a count + printed) and
`WE : f32 : M + 2` (over-rejection guard — valid const-exprs still work).
- program_index.test.zig: count-gate test extended with a binary_op value node
declared `string` (must not fold as a count).
Docs: specs.md §3 + readme.md generalized from "initializer literal" to cover
constant expressions; issues/0088 RESOLVED banner updated.
A typed module-level constant whose initializer did not match its
annotation was silently accepted: `N : string : 4` compiled, then
`print(N)` segfaulted (an integer emitted as a `string` const → a bogus
pointer) and `[N]s64` folded `N` to 4 as an integer count. Issue 0088.
Root cause: `registerTypedModuleConst` stored the annotation type but never
validated the initializer literal against it, and
`program_index.moduleConstInt` folded a const into a count by inspecting
the initializer node alone, ignoring `ModuleConstInfo.ty`.
Fix at the declaration (kills both symptoms):
- lower.zig: `registerTypedModuleConst` now validates the initializer via
`typedConstInitFits` (arms mirror `emitModuleConst`'s faithful-emit
precondition: int→int/float, float→float, bool→bool, string→string,
null→pointer/optional, `---`→any). A mismatch emits a `type mismatch`
diagnostic at the initializer span and does not register the const (also
evicting the pass-0 placeholder). Not routed through
`coercionResolver().classify`: that runtime-coercion planner is unsound
here (null's natural type is void → false-rejects `*T`; bool is 1 bit →
false-accepts s64).
- program_index.zig: `moduleConstInt` now takes the `TypeTable` and gates
the fold on `isCountableConstType(ci.ty)` (integer of any width, or a
float), so a non-numeric typed const can never fold into a count off its
initializer node. Callers in lower.zig and type_bridge.zig updated.
Regression:
- examples/1143-diagnostics-typed-module-const-mismatch.sx (negative, exit 1)
- examples/0162-types-typed-module-const-roundtrip.sx (positive)
- program_index.test.zig: gate-on-declared-type unit test
Docs: specs.md §3 Constant Binding + readme.md note the compatibility rule.
