Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
agra
ff9e448f8c fix: optional-chain getter/field correctness from 0160 adversarial review
Five adversarial reviews of the issue-0160 fix surfaced three more bugs in the
touched optional-chain / optional-coercion code; all fixed here:

1. A COLD generic-instance getter through `?.` (`?*Vec(i64)` `.getter`, never
   called directly first) panicked with "unresolved type reached LLVM emission":
   a cold instance method is absent from resolveFuncByName, so the getter's
   return type resolved to .unresolved → a ?unresolved merge type. lowerOptionalChain
   and getterReturnTypeOnDeref now warm the monomorph (ensureGenericInstanceMethodLowered)
   before querying its return type. (The 0907 test passed only by luck — List(i64)
   is warmed by stdlib use; 0907 now also exercises a cold user generic.)

2. A real-field read through a `?*T` chain (`op?.field`, op: ?*T) reinterpreted
   the pointer bits as the field (silent garbage) — the some-branch real-field
   path didn't load through the pointer. It now derefs `?*T` before the field
   access. (Pre-existing — the else-branch predates 0160 — but it's the same
   function and a silent miscompile, so fixed here.)

3. `?[]T = array` skipped the array→slice promotion (corrupt .len/.ptr): the
   lowerVarDecl optional arm wrapped the raw array. It now coerces the value to
   the optional's child type (array→slice) before wrapping.

Regression examples 0906/0907 extended to cover all three. Distinct PRE-EXISTING
bugs the reviews surfaced in untouched subsystems are filed as issues 0161
(struct-literal vs scalar), 0162 (#run returning an optional aggregate), 0163
(untagged-union payload-binding match).
2026-06-22 18:55:41 +03:00
agra
1b0c857b91 fix: struct-literal → optional coercion + #get through optional chain (issue 0160)
Two fixes for optional interactions surfaced by the #set/#get review. The
original issue 0160 mis-diagnosed (A) as an optional-chain bug; the chain works
fine for real fields. The actual bugs:

(A) A bare struct literal `.{ ... }` against an optional target `?T` was built
into the optional's {payload, has_value} layout instead of the inner T, then
re-wrapped — corrupting the value (a multi-field payload's first field clobbered
by the has_value flag, or a `?T` arg silently null) or failing LLVM
verification. lowerStructLiteral now builds the inner T, materializes it, and
wraps via coerceToType; lowerVarDecl's previously-UNCONDITIONAL optional wrap is
guarded so an already-`?T` value isn't double-wrapped. Fixed across var-decl,
arg, return, nested field, reassignment, and array-element contexts.

(B) `#get` accessors are now reachable through an optional chain (`obj?.getter`):
lowerOptionalChain dispatches the getter via a synthetic receiver, and
expr_typer types `obj?.getter` through a shared getterReturnTypeOnDeref helper
(handles `?T` and `?*T`, value and pointer optionals, and generic-instance
getters like List.len). The `#set` write side through `?.` is intentionally left
matching real-field behavior (optional-chain assignment unsupported).

Regression tests: examples/optionals/0906 (struct-literal → optional) and 0907
(accessor through chain). issues/0160 marked RESOLVED with the corrected root
cause.
2026-06-22 18:28:57 +03:00