Files
sx/examples/expected/0144-types-const-expr-array-dim.exit
agra cd39316f5e fix(ir): evaluate constant-expression array dimensions (0083)
A constant-FOLDABLE expression array dimension (`[M + 1]`, `[M * N]`,
`[N - M]`, nested `[M + N - 1]`, parenthesised `[(M + 1) * 2]`, mixing
untyped and typed module consts) was wrongly rejected as "not a
compile-time integer constant" even though every operand is
compile-time-known. Attempts 1-3 resolved only a bare named-const dim or
a literal; an expression dim must be EVALUATED, not rejected.

Fix: the shared dim resolver now routes the dimension through a single
constant integer-expression evaluator (`program_index.evalConstIntExpr`)
that folds integer `+ - * / %` and unary negate over literals and
named/typed module consts, recursively (parentheses carry no AST node).
The leaf-name lookup is delegated via `ctx.lookupDimName`, so the
stateful body-lowering path (`Lowering`, which also sees comptime
constants and generic `$N` values) and the stateless registration path
(`type_bridge.StatelessInner`, module consts only) share the EXACT SAME
folding logic and cannot diverge — an expression dim via a type alias
resolves identically to the direct form.

No-fabrication discipline unchanged: a genuinely non-comptime dimension
(runtime local, non-comptime call, unbound name) or arithmetic that
overflows / divides by zero still yields null -> `.unresolved` -> the
same clean compile-halting diagnostic, never a fabricated length.

- examples/0144-types-const-expr-array-dim.sx: every expression form,
  direct vs alias, scalar / string / struct element types (fails on the
  pre-fix compiler, passes after).
- examples/1129 re-pointed at a genuinely non-const dimension
  (`[get()]s64`, a runtime call) so it still proves the stateless
  clean-halt (a foldable expression is no longer an error).
- program_index.test.zig: unit test for evalConstIntExpr folding and
  clean-halt-on-non-const.
2026-06-04 10:38:21 +03:00

2 lines
2 B
Plaintext