Files
sx/examples/0404-protocols-dot-shorthand-protocol-field.sx
agra bdd0e96d78 feat(lang): block value requires no trailing ; (Rust-style)
A block's value is now its last statement ONLY when that statement is a
trailing expression with no `;`. A trailing `;` discards the value,
leaving the block void. This makes value-vs-statement explicit and lets
the compiler reject "this block was supposed to produce a value".

Compiler:
- Parser records `Block.produces_value` (last stmt is a no-`;` trailing
  expression) + `Block.discarded_semi` (the `;` that discarded a value),
  via `expectSemicolonAfter`. A trailing expression before `}` may now
  omit its `;` (previously a parse error). Match-arm and else-arm bodies
  are built value-producing regardless of the arm `;` (arms are exempt —
  the `;` is an arm terminator).
- Lowering: `lowerBlockValue` / the block-expr path / `inferExprType`
  respect `produces_value`. A value-position block that discards its value
  is a hard error (`lowerValueBody` for function bodies; the value-context
  `.block` path for if/else branches, `catch` bodies, value bindings,
  match arms). Pure-failable `-> !` bodies (value rides the error channel)
  and a value-if whose branches are void are handled without false errors.
- `defer`/`onfail` cleanup bodies lower as statements (void), so a
  trailing `;` there is fine.

Migration (behavior-preserving — output unchanged):
- stdlib + ~210 examples: dropped the trailing `;` on value-position last
  expressions. `format` now ends with an explicit `#insert "return
  result;"` (it relied on `#insert`-as-block-value, which `;` discards).
- Two `main :: () -> s32` examples that relied on the old silent
  default-return got an explicit trailing `0`.
- Rejection snapshots 0412 / 1013 regenerated (their quoted source lines
  lost a `;`); the diagnostics themselves are unchanged.

Docs/tests: specs.md "Block values" section; examples 0040 (rules) + 0041
(rejection); 3 parser unit tests. Filed issue 0066 (pre-existing
match-arm negated-literal phi-width quirk, surfaced not caused here).

Gates: zig build, zig build test, run_examples.sh -> 343 passed,
cross_compile.sh -> 7 passed (also refreshed its stale example names).
2026-06-02 09:23:50 +03:00

80 lines
2.2 KiB
Plaintext

// Dot-shorthand `.{ child = d }` for a struct whose first field is a protocol
// value, used as the argument to `List(Container).append` from two distinct
// container types. Exercises the cross-callsite path of dot-shorthand inference.
#import "modules/std.sx";
Drawable :: protocol {
draw :: () -> s32;
name :: () -> string;
layout :: (x: s32) -> s32;
handle :: (event: s32) -> bool;
}
Circle :: struct { radius: s32; }
impl Drawable for Circle {
draw :: (self: *Circle) -> s32 { self.radius }
name :: (self: *Circle) -> string { "circle" }
layout :: (self: *Circle, x: s32) -> s32 { x + self.radius }
handle :: (self: *Circle, event: s32) -> bool { event > 0 }
}
Square :: struct { side: s32; }
impl Drawable for Square {
draw :: (self: *Square) -> s32 { self.side * self.side }
name :: (self: *Square) -> string { "square" }
layout :: (self: *Square, x: s32) -> s32 { x + self.side }
handle :: (self: *Square, event: s32) -> bool { event > 1 }
}
Rect :: struct {
x: f32;
y: f32;
w: f32;
h: f32;
zero :: () -> Rect { Rect.{ x = 0.0, y = 0.0, w = 0.0, h = 0.0 } }
}
Container :: struct {
child: Drawable;
computed_frame: Rect = .zero();
}
// Two different structs, each with List(Container), both calling .append(.{...})
// This mirrors VStack/HStack in the game.
StackA :: struct {
children: List(Container);
add :: (self: *StackA, d: Drawable) {
// BUG: `.{ child = d }` causes LLVM error when 2+ structs do this
self.children.append(.{ child = d });
}
}
StackB :: struct {
children: List(Container);
add :: (self: *StackB, d: Drawable) {
// BUG: second struct doing `.{ child = d }` triggers the error
self.children.append(.{ child = d });
// FIX: explicit `Container.{ child = d }` works
// self.children.append(Container.{ child = d });
}
}
main :: () -> void {
c := Circle.{ radius = 42 };
s := Square.{ side = 5 };
a : StackA = .{};
a.add(c);
print("StackA: draw={}\n", a.children.items[0].child.draw());
b : StackB = .{};
b.add(s);
print("StackB: draw={}\n", b.children.items[0].child.draw());
print("OK\n");
}