Files
sx/issues/0168-array-of-optionals-element-load-broken.md
agra 3e8d003e3d fix: bindingless if/while/and/or over optional reads has_value (issue 0164)
lowerIfExpr emitted optional_has_value only for the binding form; a bare
'if opt' passed the raw {T,i1} aggregate to condBr, where emitCondBr's
catch-all struct arm silently folded it to 'i1 true' (structs always
truthy) — a silent miscompile that took the present-branch for null
optionals. while / and / or shared the same defect.

Reduce bindingless optional conditions to optional_has_value in
lowerIfExpr/lowerWhile and via a new lowerBoolCondition helper for and/or
operands. Replace the silent-true emitCondBr arm with a lowering-time
diagnostic (checkConditionType/isValidConditionType) rejecting conditions
whose type isn't bool/integer/pointer/optional; the backend @panic is now
an unreachable tripwire.

Regressions: examples/optionals/0908..0910 + diagnostics/1194 (negative).
Verified by 3+3 adversarial reviews.

Filed adjacent bugs found during review: 0168 (array-of-optionals element
load), 0169 (optional->bool coercion), 0170 (closure-optional layout).
2026-06-22 21:04:05 +03:00

2.0 KiB

0168 — indexing an array of optionals [N]?T produces a wrong/garbage element (segfault or wrong value)

Symptom

Reading an element of an array whose element type is an optional ([N]?T) is broken: depending on how the result is used it either SEGFAULTS or yields the WRONG value (reads a present element as absent). Independent of issue 0164 (the if-on-optional fix) — reproduces with a plain ?? and with a copy-to-local.

Reproduction

#import "modules/std.sx";
main :: () {
  arr : [2]?i64 = .{ null, 7 };

  // (1) index result used directly → SEGFAULT (exit 134)
  x := arr[1];
  print("{}\n", x ?? -1);   // expected: 7

  // (2) copy element to a local then test → WRONG VALUE
  e := arr[1];              // element 1 is present (7)
  if e { print("present\n"); } else { print("absent\n"); }  // prints "absent" — WRONG
}

Expected: element 1 is the present optional 7. Observed: segfault in case (1); absent (a wrong/absent optional) in case (2). The original surfacing form if arr[0] { ... } also segfaults.

Investigation prompt

The element load / addressing for an array of optionals appears to compute the wrong element stride or mis-materialize the loaded {T,i1} optional aggregate. Suspect the index/element-load lowering (src/ir/lower/expr.zig index-get path, and src/backend/llvm/ops.zig emitIndexGet) when the element type is an optional aggregate {T,i1} — check that the element size/alignment used for the GEP matches the optional's real size (cf. the size_of vs typeSizeBytes nuance for optionals), and that the loaded value is the full aggregate, not a truncated/garbage read. Compare against a working [N]T (non-optional) array load to isolate whether it's stride math or aggregate materialization.

Verify: case (1) prints 7, case (2) prints present; also test [N]?T with a struct payload ([2]?Pt) and writing elements then reading them back. Add an examples/optionals/09xx-array-of-optionals.sx regression.