c0e1a5db82
A bare reserved-type-name `::` declaration was silently accepted, and the
attempt-2 lowerCall rewrite then made a bare `s2 :: (…) {…}` function callable —
bypassing the backtick rule for handwritten sx. The reserved-name binding check
covered `:=` / typed-local / param / captures but NOT the `::` declaration form.
- ast: `ConstDecl`/`FnDecl` carry `is_raw` + `name_span` threaded from the parser
(parseConstBinding / parseFnDecl, all call sites incl. struct/impl methods).
- semantic_diagnostics: reject a bare reserved spelling at EVERY declaration-name
site — const, function (incl. struct/impl methods), struct/enum/union/error-set,
protocol, foreign-class, ufcs alias, namespaced/library/c-import name. Backtick
(`is_raw`) and the compiler's `#builtin` definition (`string :: []u8 #builtin`)
are the only exemptions; a value whose node is itself a named decl defers to
that node's own check.
- c_import: synthesized foreign fn_decls are `is_raw = true`, so a C function
whose own name collides with a reserved spelling (`int s2(int);`) imports and
bare-calls unedited.
- lower: scope the `.type_expr`→`.identifier` call rewrite to a callee FnDecl of
RAW provenance (`is_raw`) — only a backtick / `#import c` foreign fn can carry a
reserved-name spelling, so a non-raw match never gets rewritten.
- examples: 0153 (positive — backtick `::` const + fn, bare + tick call), 1140
(negative — bare `::` const + fn rejected).
- docs: specs.md + readme.md state the backtick is required at every binding site
including `::` const / function / type declarations; issue 0089 banner updated.
12 lines
366 B
Plaintext
12 lines
366 B
Plaintext
error: 's2' is a reserved type name and cannot be used as an identifier
|
|
--> examples/1140-diagnostics-reserved-name-const-fn-decl.sx:14:1
|
|
|
|
|
14 | s2 :: 5;
|
|
| ^^
|
|
|
|
error: 'u8' is a reserved type name and cannot be used as an identifier
|
|
--> examples/1140-diagnostics-reserved-name-const-fn-decl.sx:15:1
|
|
|
|
|
15 | u8 :: (n: s64) -> s64 { return n + 7; }
|
|
| ^^
|