The compile-time float evaluator lagged the integer one: it had no numeric-limit field-access arm, so `y : s64 = f64.true_min + 0.5` (=0.5) silently truncated to 0 even though the direct `f64.true_min` already errored; the arm-by-arm audit also found a missing `%` arm, so `y : s64 = 5.5 % 2.0` (=1.5) silently truncated to 1. Bring evalConstFloatExpr to PARITY with evalConstIntExpr: - Add a `.field_access` arm resolving a builtin FLOAT numeric-limit accessor (`f64.max`, `f32.epsilon`, `f64.true_min`, …) via the SAME `type_resolver.floatLimitFor` that `lowerNumericLimit` uses — the float twin of the int evaluator's `integerLimitFor` arm. - Add a `.mod` arm via `@rem` (matching evalConstIntExpr and codegen's `frem`): `6.0 % 4.0` folds to 2 (via int delegation), `5.5 % 2.0` = 1.5 is rejected. The two evaluators now share every leaf/operator shape, so no compile-time-const float form escapes the unified float→int rule at one site while folding at another. All five sites (local/field/param/const/ array-dim) stay consistent. Regression: 0168 (positive) adds `f64.max - f64.max` → 0, `6.0 % 4.0` → 2, integer-limit `s8.max`/`[u8.max]` unregressed, `xx` escapes for both new forms; 1146 (negative) adds `f64.true_min + 0.5` and `5.5 % 2.0` erroring at a binding site; program_index.test.zig covers the floatLimitFor arm and the `%` arm. specs.md + readme.md state the parity. issues/0095 RESOLVED banner gains the attempt-5 entry.
12 KiB
0095 — typed local/decl silently truncates a float initializer to an integer annotation
RESOLVED (F0.11). Agra ruled the UNIFIED rule (Option B): an implicit float→int in a typed binding behaves exactly like the array-dimension rule — an integral float FOLDS to its integer (
4.0→ 4,-2.0→ -2), a non-integral float is a COMPILE ERROR (1.5,4.5), and an explicitxx/cast(T)ALWAYS truncates (the escape). Applied consistently across typed local / param-default / field-default, typed module CONST, and array dim — all reusing the singleprogram_index.floatToIntExact/evalConstIntExprfacility (no second integral check).Fix (
src/ir/lower.zig,src/ir/module.zig,src/ir/program_index.zig):
Builder.constFloatInforeads a compile-timeconst_floatback from its Ref (value + span).coerceToTypenow means IMPLICIT coercion: its.float_to_intarm folds an integral const-float toconstInt, else emits the narrowing diagnostic.coerceExplicitis the raw truncating path;xx(lowerXX) andcast(T)route through it so the escape still truncates.- Field-default lowering (struct-literal pad, named-field default,
buildDefaultValue) now coerces the default to the field type at the IR level (was silently bit-coerced byemitStructInit).- Const path:
typedConstInitFitsaccepts an integral float (literal or aM + 2.0-style expression that folds viaevalComptimeInt);emitModuleConst/constExprValue/globalInitValuefold an integral float to its int and reject a non-integral one.Completion (F0.11 attempt 2) — the direct-
const_floatcoerce arm only caught a float LITERAL; a non-integral const-folded float EXPRESSION (local/field/param : s64 = M + 0.5) still truncated silently. Closed by:
- New
program_index.evalConstFloatExpr— the f64 counterpart toevalConstIntExpr, delegating every integer subtree back to it (no parallel integer logic), adding only the float literal / negate /+ - * /arms.Lowering.foldComptimeFloatInitroutes the typed LOCAL, struct FIELD default, and call ARGUMENT (incl. an expanded param default) throughevalConstFloatExpr+floatToIntExact: an integral comptime float folds, a non-integral one errors, a genuine runtime float /xxcast is left to the normal path. (Run pureevalConstFloatExprFIRST so a$pack[i]arg isn't spuriously type-resolved out of binding.)- One
Lowering.diagNonIntegralNarrownow emits the narrowing wording at all five sites (coerce arm, global init, const-expr value, the typed-binding sites, and the typed-const path), so the typed-CONST non-integral diagnostic readscannot implicitly narrow non-integral float …instead of the staleinitializer is a float literal / floating-point expression.Completion (F0.11 attempt 3) — attempt 2 resolved INT-const-expr leaves (
M + 0.5,M :: 2), but a non-integral result via a FLOAT-const leaf (F : f64 : 2.5; y : s64 = F + 0.25= 2.75) still truncated silently:evalConstFloatExprdelegated only integer leaves toevalConstIntExprand had no float-const leaf arm. Closed by completing the evaluator:
program_index.moduleConstFloat— the f64 twin ofmoduleConstInt(sameisCountableConstTypegate, same cyclic-definition frame), recovering a numeric module const's value throughevalConstFloatExpr. A newlookupFloatNamectx method (onLoweringandModuleConstCtx) surfaces a NON-INTEGRAL float const leaf;evalConstFloatExprgained.identifier/.type_exprarms that call it. Integer / integral-float leaves keep resolving through the existingevalConstIntExprdelegation, so the unified rule now applies to ANY compile-time-constant float expression — literal, int-const leaf, float-const leaf, and combinations — at every binding site.typedConstInitFitsnow judges integral-fold viaevalConstFloatExpr+floatToIntExact(the SAME facilityfoldComptimeFloatInituses) instead of the int-onlyevalComptimeInt, which folded leaf-by-leaf ini64and so rejected an integral SUM built from a non-integral float leaf (K : s64 : F + 1.5= 4.0). Integral float-const-leaf consts now FOLD; non-integral ones still error with the unified wording.- Out of scope (consistent with the int evaluator): a LOCAL
::const leaf is resolved as a scope ref, not through the const tables, so neitherevalConstIntExprnorevalConstFloatExprfolds it — a localM : s64 : 2inM + 0.5and a localF : f64 : 2.5inF + 0.25both still truncate identically. Float now matches int exactly at that boundary.Completion (F0.11 attempt 4) — attempts 1–3 unified the four binding sites (local / field / param / const) for compile-time float exprs, but the ARRAY- DIMENSION / count path still diverged: it folded a DIRECT integral float literal (
[4.0],[N]withN : f64 : 4.0) yet rejected an INTEGRAL expression built from a non-integral float-const leaf ([F + 1.5]= 4.0, or[K]withK : s64 : F + 1.5) as "must be a compile-time integer constant" — because the dim fold used the int-onlyevalConstIntExpr, never the float-aware path. Closed by routing the count fold through the SAME facility the other four sites use:
- New
program_index.foldCountI64— the single int-or-integral-float count fold:evalConstIntExprfirst, then (only on failure)evalConstFloatExpr+floatToIntExact.foldDimU32(array dim / Vector lane / u32 value-param) and the non-u32value-param gate both delegate to it, so no count site disagrees on which floats fold (the issue-0083 unify-or-diverge rule extended to floats).- A new
DimU32.non_integral_floatvariant carries a non-integral float dim to a distinct, accurate diagnostic ("array dimension must be an integer, but '2.75' is a non-integral float") rather than the generic "must be a compile-time integer constant" — the cast-escape advice the binding sites give does not apply in a dimension position, so the dim wording omits it.reportDimError, the Vector-lane resolver, and the top-level array-alias diagnostic all handle the new variant, so the DIRECT (a : [F + 0.25]s64) and type-ALIAS (Arr :: [F + 0.25]s64) forms emit the identical message.type_bridge.StatelessInner.lookupFloatName(routed throughmoduleConstFloat) is the float twin of itslookupDimName, so the registration-time alias path folds a float-const-leaf dimension to the SAME count as the stateful direct path. This relaxes the F0.4examples/1132wording (a non-integral float const dim now reports the precise "non-integral float" message; it still errors).Completion (F0.11 attempt 5) — attempts 1–4 unified all five sites for literal / int-const-expr / float-const-leaf forms, but
evalConstFloatExprstill LAGGEDevalConstIntExpr: the int evaluator resolves a numeric-limit field-access leaf (f64.true_min,f64.max) viatype_resolver.integerLimitFor, but the float evaluator had no parallel arm, soy : s64 = f64.true_min + 0.5(= 0.5) truncated silently to 0 (the directf64.true_minalready errored via the IR-levelconstFloatInfopath, but the expression form escaped). Closed by bringing the two evaluators to PARITY:
evalConstFloatExprgains a.field_accessarm that resolves a builtin FLOAT numeric-limit accessor throughtype_resolver.TypeResolver.floatLimitFor(the SAME facilitylowerNumericLimituses) — the float twin of the int evaluator'sintegerLimitForarm. Integer limits /<pack>.lenare still resolved by the int delegation, so only the float-limit case lands here.- The audit also surfaced a missing
%arm: the int evaluator folds.modbut the float one did not, soy : s64 = 5.5 % 2.0(= 1.5) truncated silently to 1.evalConstFloatExprnow handles.modvia@rem(matchingevalConstIntExprand codegen'sfrem;6.0 % 4.0folds to 2 via the int delegation,5.5 % 2.0= 1.5 is rejected). The two evaluators are now at full leaf/operator parity, so no compile-time-const float shape escapes the rule at one site while folding at another. (A comptime-fn returning float is a genuinely new form for BOTH and is out of scope.)Regression tests:
examples/0168-types-integral-float-to-int.sx(positive — local/field/param/const fold, integral int-const-EXPRESSION (M + 2.0) AND float-const-LEAF (F + 1.5,F : f64 : 2.5) fold at local/field/param/const,xx/casttruncate incl.xx (M + 0.5)/xx (F + 0.25)),examples/1146-diagnostics-nonintegral-float-to-int.sx(negative — non-integral LITERAL, int-const-EXPRESSION (M + 0.5), AND float-const-LEAF (F + 0.25) error at local/param/field), the integral-float const cases inexamples/0162-types-typed-module-const-roundtrip.sx, and the aligned const diagnostic inexamples/1143-diagnostics-typed-module-const-mismatch.sx(G / BAD / BAD2 stay errors with the new wording). The array-dimension site is pinned in the same two examples: 0168 adds[F + 1.5]s64,[KF]s64(KF : s64 : F + 1.5), and a type-aliasArrFE :: [F + 1.5]s64all folding to len 4; 1146 adds[F + 0.25]s64erroring;examples/1132now expects the precise non-integral-float dim wording. Unit:program_index.test.zig"evalConstFloatExpr folds comptime float expressions" (covers the float-const leaf:F→ 2.5,F + 0.25→ 2.75,F + 1.5→ 4.0; attempt 5 adds the numeric-limit leaff64.max/f64.true_min/f32.epsilon,f64.max - f64.max→ 0,f64.true_min + 0.5→ 0.5, and the%arm5.5 % 2.0→ 1.5 /% 0.0→ null) and "foldCountI64 / foldDimU32 fold an integral float count, reject a non-integral one" (the count fold + thenon_integral_float/below_mindistinction). Attempt 5 also extends 0168 (positive:f64.max - f64.max→ 0,6.0 % 4.0→ 2, integer-limits8.max/[u8.max]unregressed,xxescapes for both new forms) and 1146 (negative:f64.true_min + 0.5and5.5 % 2.0error at a binding site).
Symptom
A typed LOCAL (and likely typed param/field) silently truncates a floating-point initializer to an integer annotation instead of rejecting or requiring an explicit cast.
Observed:
y : s64 = 1.5;→ y == 1 (float literal truncated, no diagnostic)y : s64 = 2 + 0.5;→ y == 2 (float-valued expr truncated, no diagnostic)
Expected: a type-mismatch / narrowing diagnostic (consistent with typed MODULE CONSTS,
which after F0.7 reject N : s64 : 1.5 and N : s64 : M + 0.5). Today consts are strict
but locals are lenient — an inconsistency.
Reproduction
#import "modules/std.sx";
main :: () {
y : s64 = 1.5;
print("{}\n", y); // prints 1
}
Investigation prompt
Decide + implement the language rule for implicit float→int narrowing in a TYPED binding
(local / param / field) initializer. Module consts already reject it (F0.7,
registerTypedModuleConst + typedConstInitFits/constExprInitFits). Make typed-local/param/field
assignment-coercion consistent: either reject a non-integral float→int initializer with a
diagnostic (matching the const path) or require an explicit xx/cast. Suspected area: the
assignment / typed-binding coercion path (coerceToType ladder, specs.md §"coercion") in
src/ir/lower.zig. Verify y : s64 = 1.5 errors (or requires a cast); confirm integral-float
folding rules (specs.md: 4.0→4 ok, 4.5 rejected) stay consistent. Then gate.
Disposition
Discovered during F0.7 (issue 0088) attempt-2 review. Agra ruled F0.7 fixes the inferExprType ROOT for binary-op promotion; this typed-LOCAL narrowing is a SEPARATE assignment-coercion concern -> its own scheduled step.