Files
sx/examples/errors/1047-errors-value-slot-liveness-reject.sx
agra 989e18b760 feat: tuple syntax cutover — Tuple(...) type + .(...) value
Replace the bare-paren tuple grammar with explicit, position-unambiguous
forms, mirroring how structs work:

  type     `(A, B)`        -> `Tuple(A, B)`          (named keeps `:`)
  value    `(a, b)`        -> `.(a, b)`              (named uses `=`)
  typed    (new)           -> `Tuple(A, B).(a, b)`   (like `Point.{...}`)
  failable `-> (T, !)`     -> `-> T !`
           `-> (T1, T2, !)`-> `-> Tuple(T1, T2) !`   (channel outside Tuple)

Bare `(...)` is now grouping only, everywhere; a comma in bare parens is a
hard error with a migration hint. Grouping, function types `(A, B) -> R`,
param lists, lambdas, and match bindings are unaffected.

`Tuple(...)` is strictly a TYPE in every position (including `size_of` /
`type_info` args); a tuple VALUE comes only from `.(...)` (anonymous) or
`Tuple(...).(...)` (explicitly typed). A bare `Tuple(1, 2)` is a tuple
type with non-type elements -> rejected.

The ~110 tuple-bearing corpus files were migrated with a one-shot
AST-aware migrator (the `sx migrate` tool from the prior commit, removed
here). New examples: 0130 (new syntax), 0131 (typed construction), 1060
(named-tuple failable return). 1116 golden updated for the new hint text.
2026-06-25 17:53:57 +03:00

36 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

// Rejection counterpart to 1046 (ERR step E1.8). Reading a failable's value slot
// where its error is NOT proven absent is a compile error. Two unproven shapes:
//
// (A) reading the value inside the `if err { … }` error path itself
// (B) reading the value after a bare tag-compare (`if err == error.X`), which
// narrows the tag but proves nothing about absence
//
// Each read is rejected with the E1.8 diagnostic; the program never runs (exit 1).
#import "modules/std.sx";
E :: error { Bad }
parse :: (n: i32) -> i32 !E {
if n < 0 { raise error.Bad; }
return n * 10;
}
// (A) the read sits on the error path — `err` is present here, not absent.
bad_a :: () -> i32 {
v, err := parse(5);
if err { return v; } // REJECTED: err present on this path
return 0;
}
// (B) a tag-compare narrows which error, but does not prove there is none.
bad_b :: () -> i32 {
v, err := parse(5);
if err == error.Bad { return 1; }
return v; // REJECTED: err not proven absent
}
main :: () -> i32 {
return bad_a() + bad_b();
}