The block-value rework routes value-position `{ … }` through the same
statement parser as every other block, so a destructure decl (and any
statement form) inside a value-bound block now parses, with the trailing
expression as the block's value. The `defer { … }` half was fixed
earlier (634cf9b). Regression: examples/0042-basic-block-value-destructure.sx.
Gates: zig build test, run_examples.sh -> 344 passed.
3.6 KiB
0065 — block-expression body does not parse a destructure decl (v, e := f();)
RESOLVED. Two fixes landed:
- The braced
defer { … }body now parses viaparseBlock(src/parser.zig, thekw_deferarm) instead ofparseExpr, mirroringonfail. Regression:examples/1050-errors-defer-block-body.sx(commit634cf9b).- The general value-producing block in binding position fell out of the trailing-
;block-value rework: value-position{ … }now routes through the same statement parser as every other block, so a destructure decl (and any statement form) parses, and the trailing expression is the block's value. Regression:examples/0042-basic-block-value-destructure.sx.
Symptom
A destructure declaration (v, e := f();) inside a block used in
expression position fails to parse with expected ';'. Two surfaced
forms:
defer { v, e := f(); ... }— adeferbody is parsed viaparseExpr(so its{ ... }is a block-EXPRESSION), and the block-expression statement loop doesn't recognize thename, name :=destructure form.y := { v, e := f(); v };— a value-producing block bound to a name.
Observed: error: expected ';' pointing at the statement after the
destructure (the parser bails at the := and resyncs). Expected: the
destructure parses exactly as it does in a normal statement block (an
if body, a plain { } statement block, or an onfail { } body — all of
which use parseBlock and handle it fine).
This is the same family as the pre-existing "value-producing block body
in binding position doesn't parse" note in current/CHECKPOINT-ERR.md
(E2.4b log). onfail { } is unaffected because it parses its body with
parseBlock (src/parser.zig ~2063); defer is affected because it uses
parseExpr (~2029).
Reproduction
#import "modules/std.sx";
E :: error { Bad }
val :: () -> (s32, !E) { return 5; }
f :: () -> !E {
defer {
v, e := val(); // ← error: expected ';'
print("v={}\n", v);
}
return;
}
main :: () -> s32 { return 0; }
Also reproduces with no defer, as a plain value block:
y := {
v, e := val(); // ← error: expected ';'
v
};
Investigation prompt
The block-expression statement loop (the parser path reached from
parseExpr when it hits { — see src/parser.zig, the block-as-value
parsing around the parsePrimary/parseBlockExpr path, distinct from
parseBlock at ~1931) parses each inner statement but does not run the
destructure-decl detection that parseStmt does. Find where
parseStmt/parseBlock recognizes the ident (, ident)+ := lookahead
and make the block-expression statement loop use the same statement
parser (ideally route block-expression bodies through parseStmt so
every statement form — destructure, var/const decl, etc. — is handled
uniformly).
For defer specifically: the simplest aligned fix is to parse a
braced defer body with parseBlock (like onfail does) while keeping
the bare-expression form (defer expr;) on parseExpr. That removes the
defer-body manifestation even if the general block-expression path is
handled separately.
Verification: run the repro above — expect it to compile and run
(exit 0), with the destructure-bound value usable under an if !e { … }
guard (ERR E1.8). Add a regression example under examples/ once fixed.
Status
OPEN. Orthogonal to ERR E1.7/E1.8 — the spec'd cleanup-body absorbers are
catch / or <value> (both parse fine in a defer body), so this does
not block the error-handling work. Filed while implementing E1.7.