P2.3: publish enforces cross-entity identity (no cross-app dangling edge)

Repo.publish validated entities individually and checked
artifact.release_id == release.id, but never verified the published
aggregate forms one consistent identity graph. It could commit a channel
whose app_id differs from the release's app (a channel of app B pointing
at app A's release) or artifacts whose app_id differs from the release's
app — exactly the dangling/cross-app edge the acceptance forbids.

Add Integrity preconditions to the publish transaction (reusing the
existing len-reset/channel-restore rollback so the model is unchanged on
failure): the release's app must exist, the promoted channel must belong
to that app (chan.app_id == release.app_id), and every artifact must
belong to that app AND name this release (a.app_id == release.app_id and
a.release_id == release.id).

Extend tests/repo_transaction.sx with cross-app channel and cross-app
artifact cases asserting publish raises Integrity and leaves the model
unchanged; the existing rollback and no-dangling assertions stay green.
This commit is contained in:
agra
2026-06-06 01:19:22 +03:00
parent aa3b690381
commit d8380ed451
2 changed files with 84 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -24,8 +24,10 @@
#import "../domain/validate.sx";
// Failure classes for the publish transaction. `Validation` = a release /
// artifact / channel failed domain validation; `Integrity` = an artifact
// named a release_id other than the release being published.
// artifact / channel failed domain validation; `Integrity` = the published
// aggregate is cross-identity inconsistent — the release names an app that
// doesn't exist, or an artifact / promoted channel whose app_id or release_id
// doesn't match the release being published.
PublishErr :: error {
Validation,
Integrity,
@@ -191,6 +193,13 @@ Repo :: struct {
// and, in particular, no channel left pointing at a release that isn't
// in the repo (the "no dangling release" invariant).
//
// The published aggregate must also form ONE consistent identity graph,
// else committing it would create a cross-app dangling edge. So, as an
// Integrity precondition: the release's app must exist, the promoted
// channel must belong to that app (chan.app_id == release.app_id), and
// every artifact must belong to that app AND name this release
// (a.app_id == release.app_id and a.release_id == release.id).
//
// Rollback is by snapshot: List appends only bump `len`, so undoing them
// is a `len` reset; an updated existing channel is restored from a saved
// copy. The channel pointer is forced to `release.id` here, so a
@@ -207,12 +216,25 @@ Repo :: struct {
integrity := false;
validate_release(release) catch { failed = true; };
// Cross-entity identity preconditions for the whole aggregate: the
// release's app must exist and the promoted channel must belong to
// that same app. (Per-artifact identity is checked in the loop.)
if !failed {
if self.get_app(release.app_id) == null { integrity = true; failed = true; }
}
if !failed {
if chan.app_id != release.app_id { integrity = true; failed = true; }
}
if !failed {
self.releases.append(release, self.own_allocator);
i := 0;
while i < arts.len {
a := arts.items[i];
if a.release_id != release.id { integrity = true; failed = true; break; }
if a.app_id != release.app_id or a.release_id != release.id {
integrity = true; failed = true; break;
}
validate_artifact(a) catch { failed = true; };
if failed { break; }
self.artifacts.append(a, self.own_allocator);

View File

@@ -36,16 +36,22 @@ mk_release :: (id: string, version: string) -> Release {
};
}
mk_artifact :: (id: string, release_id: string, digest: string) -> Artifact {
return mk_artifact_for(id, "app_01", release_id, digest);
}
mk_artifact_for :: (id: string, app_id: string, release_id: string, digest: string) -> Artifact {
return Artifact.{
id = id, app_id = "app_01", release_id = release_id, platform = .android_apk,
id = id, app_id = app_id, release_id = release_id, platform = .android_apk,
filename = "a.apk", content_type = "application/vnd.android.package-archive",
size_bytes = 1024, sha256 = digest, storage_key = digest,
metadata = "", validation_status = .pending,
};
}
the_channel :: () -> Channel {
return mk_channel_for("app_01");
}
mk_channel_for :: (app_id: string) -> Channel {
return Channel.{
app_id = "app_01", name = "stable", current_release_id = "",
app_id = app_id, name = "stable", current_release_id = "",
policy = .manual, rollout_percent = 100,
};
}
@@ -124,7 +130,57 @@ main :: () -> s32 {
process.assert(c2v.current_release_id == "rel_00", "integrity rollback: channel still rel_00");
print(" integrity failure rolled back: channel still rel_00\n");
// ── 4. Persisted state reflects the rollback, not the attempts ──
// ── 4. Cross-app channel promotion: chan.app_id != release.app_id
// The release belongs to app_01 but the promoted channel claims app_02.
// Committing it would leave a channel of one app pointing at another
// app's release — a cross-identity dangling edge. Must raise Integrity.
arts_xc : List(Artifact) = .{};
arts_xc.append(mk_artifact("art_xc", "rel_xc", DIGEST_B)); // self-consistent artifact
xc_failed := false;
xc_integrity := false;
repo.publish(mk_release("rel_xc", "1.3.0"), @arts_xc, mk_channel_for("app_02")) catch e {
xc_failed = true;
xc_integrity = (e == error.Integrity);
};
process.assert(xc_failed, "cross-app channel promotion must fail");
process.assert(xc_integrity, "cross-app channel promotion must raise Integrity");
process.assert(repo.releases.len == rel_n, "cross-app channel rollback: release count unchanged");
process.assert(repo.artifacts.len == art_n, "cross-app channel rollback: artifact count unchanged");
process.assert(repo.channels.len == chan_n, "cross-app channel rollback: channel count unchanged");
process.assert(repo.get_release("rel_xc") == null, "cross-app channel rollback: release absent");
process.assert(repo.get_channel("app_02", "stable") == null, "cross-app channel rollback: no app_02 channel created");
cx := repo.get_channel("app_01", "stable");
process.assert(cx != null, "cross-app channel rollback: app_01 channel still exists");
cxv := cx!;
process.assert(cxv.current_release_id == "rel_00", "cross-app channel rollback: app_01 channel still -> rel_00");
print(" cross-app channel promotion rejected: model unchanged\n");
// ── 5. Cross-app artifact: artifact.app_id != release.app_id ─────
// The release and channel both belong to app_01, but the artifact claims
// app_02 (its release_id still matches). Only release_id was checked
// before; the app_id mismatch must now raise Integrity and roll back.
arts_xa : List(Artifact) = .{};
arts_xa.append(mk_artifact_for("art_xa", "app_02", "rel_xa", DIGEST_B));
xa_failed := false;
xa_integrity := false;
repo.publish(mk_release("rel_xa", "1.4.0"), @arts_xa, the_channel()) catch e {
xa_failed = true;
xa_integrity = (e == error.Integrity);
};
process.assert(xa_failed, "cross-app artifact must fail");
process.assert(xa_integrity, "cross-app artifact must raise Integrity");
process.assert(repo.releases.len == rel_n, "cross-app artifact rollback: release count unchanged");
process.assert(repo.artifacts.len == art_n, "cross-app artifact rollback: artifact count unchanged");
process.assert(repo.channels.len == chan_n, "cross-app artifact rollback: channel count unchanged");
process.assert(repo.get_release("rel_xa") == null, "cross-app artifact rollback: release absent");
process.assert(repo.find_artifact_by_digest(DIGEST_B) == null, "cross-app artifact rollback: artifact absent");
cy := repo.get_channel("app_01", "stable");
process.assert(cy != null, "cross-app artifact rollback: channel still exists");
cyv := cy!;
process.assert(cyv.current_release_id == "rel_00", "cross-app artifact rollback: channel still -> rel_00");
print(" cross-app artifact rejected: model unchanged\n");
// ── 6. Persisted state reflects the rollback, not the attempts ───
serr := false;
save(repo, root) catch { serr = true; };
process.assert(!serr, "save must succeed");