ffi 1.11–1.13: #objc_call inside struct method / protocol / closure / generic

108/108 regression tests pass (+ffi-objc-call-09-in-construct,
+issue-0038 from the prior commit).

One trivial Obj-C call (`[obj hash]` returning NSUInteger) routed
through four sx surface constructs:

  1. struct method body          Probe.fetch
  2. protocol impl method body   impl Hashable for Probe
  3. closure value body          make_hasher
  4. generic function body       hash_through(recv: $T)

No new ABI shapes touched — pins that the `objc_msg_send` lowering
emits identical call shapes regardless of enclosing scope. Each
case validates the result `h_N == h_1` after threading `recv`
appropriately for each context.

The closure path reaches `recv` via a module-level global rather
than capturing the surrounding parameter — issue-0038 (prior
commit) documents the closure free-variable analyzer missing the
`FfiIntrinsicCall` node, with a clean workaround pinned.
This commit is contained in:
agra
2026-05-19 18:57:41 +03:00
parent 39b1bd03a6
commit 6dab8a157f
3 changed files with 90 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
// Phase 1 steps 1.111.13 (PLAN-FFI.md): `#objc_call` call sites
// embedded inside the sx surface constructs. None touch a new ABI
// path — the lowering routes the call identically regardless of
// the enclosing scope, and this test pins that lemma.
//
// 1. Struct method body Probe.fetch
// 2. Protocol impl method body impl Hashable for Probe
// 3. Closure value body closure that calls hash
//
// 1.14 (separate test): `inline if OS == { case }` gating across
// targets — verified by `tests/cross_compile.sh`.
#import "modules/std.sx";
#import "modules/compiler.sx";
#import "modules/std/objc.sx";
// ── 1. Struct method calling #objc_call ─────────────────────────────
Probe :: struct {
receiver: *void = null;
fetch :: (self: *Probe) -> s64 {
#objc_call(s64)(self.receiver, "hash");
}
}
// ── 2. Protocol impl method ────────────────────────────────────────
Hashable :: protocol {
sx_hash :: (self: *Self) -> s64;
}
impl Hashable for Probe {
sx_hash :: (self: *Probe) -> s64 {
#objc_call(s64)(self.receiver, "hash") * 2;
}
}
// ── 3. Closure body invoking #objc_call ─────────────────────────────
// Closure-captured `recv` isn't traced through the `#objc_call` AST
// node by sema today, so we reach the receiver via a module-level
// global. The lemma we lock here is that lowering routes the call
// the same way inside a closure body as it does at top level.
g_hasher_recv : *void = null;
make_hasher :: () -> Closure(s32) -> s64 {
closure((dummy: s32) -> s64 => #objc_call(s64)(g_hasher_recv, "hash"));
}
// ── 4. Generic function body — instantiated per call site ───────────
hash_through :: (recv: $T) -> s64 {
p : *void = xx recv;
#objc_call(s64)(p, "hash");
}
main :: () -> s32 {
inline if OS == .macos {
ns_object := objc_getClass("NSObject".ptr);
p : Probe = .{ receiver = ns_object };
// 1. struct method
h1 := p.fetch();
print("fetch != 0 = {}\n", h1 != 0);
// 2. protocol method (doubles the raw hash; mostly checking
// dispatch / arg threading, not the math)
h2 := p.sx_hash();
print("protocol h2 = {}\n", h2 == h1 * 2);
// 3. closure (receives a dummy arg to keep the `Closure(T) -> R`
// arity matching 35-closures.sx; recv comes via a global —
// closure capture through `#objc_call` AST nodes isn't
// traced by sema today and would error "unresolved").
g_hasher_recv = ns_object;
hasher := make_hasher();
h3 := hasher(0);
print("closure h3 = {}\n", h3 == h1);
// 4. generic function — instantiates with T = *void here
h4 := hash_through(ns_object);
print("generic h4 = {}\n", h4 == h1);
}
inline if OS != .macos {
print("skipped (not macos)\n");
}
0;
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
0

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
fetch != 0 = true
protocol h2 = true
closure h3 = true
generic h4 = true