A closure literal declared inside a `defer` body segfaulted the compiler. Root cause: lowerLambda never opened its own `func_defer_base` window. Every other function-lowering entry (lowerFunction / monomorphizeFunction / monomorphizePackFn) saves func_defer_base, sets it to defer_stack.items.len, and restores it — lowerLambda didn't. So a lambda's `return` drained the ENCLOSING function's defers; when the defer body itself declared the lambda, draining re-lowered the lambda, which returned, which drained again → infinite recursion → stack-overflow SIGSEGV (the failable variant surfaced one frame out, in expandCallDefaults→lookupFn reading a clobbered scope). Fix: lowerLambda now saves func_defer_base + the defer_stack length, sets the base to the current length (a fresh window), and restores both on exit — so a lambda's `return` drains only its own defers. Regression: examples/0310-closures-closure-literal-in-defer.sx — a closure declared and called inside a `defer`; verifies `body` then `defer closure: 42` at scope exit (exit 0). Issue 0073 marked RESOLVED; repro promoted from issues/0073-*.sx. zig build, zig build test, tests/run_examples.sh (358/0) all green.
103 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
103 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
# issue 0073 — closure literal inside a `defer` body segfaults the compiler
|
|
|
|
> **✅ RESOLVED (2026-06-02).** Root cause: `lowerLambda` never opened its own
|
|
> `defer` window. Every other function-lowering entry (`lowerFunction`,
|
|
> `monomorphizeFunction`, `monomorphizePackFn`) saves `func_defer_base`, sets it
|
|
> to `defer_stack.items.len`, and restores it — but `lowerLambda` didn't, so a
|
|
> lambda's `return` drained the *enclosing* function's defers. When the defer
|
|
> body itself declared the lambda, draining re-lowered the lambda, which `return`ed,
|
|
> which drained again → infinite recursion → stack-overflow SIGSEGV.
|
|
> Fix: `lowerLambda` now opens a fresh defer window (save `func_defer_base` +
|
|
> `defer_stack` length, set base to the current length, restore both on exit) —
|
|
> `src/ir/lower.zig`. Regression test: `examples/0310-closures-closure-literal-in-defer.sx`
|
|
> (a closure declared + called inside a `defer`; verifies `body` then
|
|
> `defer closure: 42` at scope exit). Suite 358/0.
|
|
|
|
## Symptom
|
|
|
|
One-line: declaring a **closure literal inside a `defer` body** crashes the
|
|
compiler with a segfault during lowering.
|
|
|
|
- **Observed:** `sx run` / `sx build` SIGSEGVs in `lowerLambda`
|
|
(`src/ir/lower.zig`) while lowering the enclosing function. With a *failable*
|
|
closure (`() -> !E { ... }`) the crash surfaces one frame out, in
|
|
`lowerCall` → `expandCallDefaults` → `scope.lookupFn` → `hash_map.get` (a
|
|
corrupted/garbage scope pointer), suggesting a stale/clobbered `self.scope`
|
|
(or builder/current-function state) while the deferred body is lowered.
|
|
- **Expected:** the program either lowers normally or produces a clean
|
|
diagnostic. A compiler segfault is never acceptable, regardless of whether the
|
|
shape is intended to be supported.
|
|
|
|
Isolation (all on `arch-refactor`, current `HEAD`):
|
|
|
|
| Probe | Shape | Result |
|
|
|-------|-------|--------|
|
|
| (a) | failable closure declared + `cb() catch e {}` — **no `defer`** | OK (exit 0) |
|
|
| (b) | failable closure literal inside a `defer` body | **SIGSEGV** (lowerCall/expandCallDefaults) |
|
|
| (c) | **non-failable** `() { return; }` inside a `defer` body | **SIGSEGV** (lowerLambda) |
|
|
| (d) | failable closure literal inside a plain `{ … }` block (not `defer`) | OK (exit 0) |
|
|
|
|
So the trigger is **a closure literal lowered inside a `defer` body** — not
|
|
failability, not whether the closure is called. (a)/(d) prove closures and
|
|
failable closures lower fine outside a `defer`; (c) proves a bare non-failable
|
|
closure in a `defer` is enough to crash.
|
|
|
|
## Reproduction
|
|
|
|
`issues/0073-closure-literal-in-defer-segfault.sx` (minimal — non-failable,
|
|
uncalled closure in a `defer`):
|
|
|
|
```sx
|
|
#import "modules/std.sx";
|
|
|
|
work :: () {
|
|
defer { cb := () { return; }; }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
main :: () -> s32 {
|
|
work();
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Run: `./zig-out/bin/sx run issues/0073-closure-literal-in-defer-segfault.sx`
|
|
→ "Segmentation fault" with a stack through `lowerLambda` (`src/ir/lower.zig`).
|
|
|
|
## Investigation prompt
|
|
|
|
A `defer` body is captured at its declaration site and lowered into the
|
|
function's exit/cleanup path (drained by `lowerReturn` / block-exit), not inline.
|
|
Lowering a **lambda literal** while emitting a deferred body appears to run with
|
|
invalid lowering state — most likely `self.scope` (note probe (b)'s crash is in
|
|
`scope.lookupFn` reading a hash map at a garbage address) and/or the
|
|
builder's current-function / block context is stale or not the one
|
|
`lowerLambda` expects when it allocates the closure's trampoline + env.
|
|
|
|
Suspected area: `src/ir/lower.zig` — `lowerLambda` (~`:8145`) and the `defer`
|
|
capture/replay path (`defer_stmt` handling + the cleanup-drain in `lowerReturn` /
|
|
block exit; grep `defer_stack` / `func_defer_base`). Check whether deferred
|
|
bodies are lowered:
|
|
1. with a scope pointer that has since been popped/freed (use-after-free →
|
|
garbage `fn_names`/`map` in `lookupFn`), or
|
|
2. in a builder state where `lowerLambda`'s assumptions (current function,
|
|
insert block) don't hold, or
|
|
3. re-entrantly / unbounded (the failable-variant trace looked like deep
|
|
recursion through `expandCallDefaults`→`lowerCall`→`lowerLambda`).
|
|
|
|
Likely fix shape: lower deferred bodies under a valid, live scope (re-establish
|
|
or retain the declaring scope when replaying the `defer` body), or defer the
|
|
lambda's trampoline emission to a context that has the right function/block.
|
|
|
|
Verification step: run the repro above — expect it to lower cleanly (or emit a
|
|
clean diagnostic) and NOT segfault. Then confirm a closure that is actually used
|
|
inside the defer (`defer { cb := () { ... }; cb(); }`) also works, and re-run
|
|
`bash tests/run_examples.sh` (357/0) to confirm no regression.
|
|
|
|
## Provenance
|
|
|
|
Found while writing an A5.2 (architecture stream) test-first scaffolding example
|
|
for the ERR E1.7 "cleanup-absorption stops at nested closures" behavior — the
|
|
closure-boundary probe (a closure literal inside a `defer`) crashed the compiler
|
|
instead of exercising the diagnostic. The crash is a pre-existing lowering bug,
|
|
unrelated to the A5 error-analysis extraction; surfaced by the probe.
|